Saturday, 17 December 2011

Exhibitions

Delacroix (1798 - 1863)
Caixa Forum Madrid / 19.10.2011 - 15.1.2012 / Free / Official website (includes a virtual tour)

Self portrait (1837)
Oil on canvas, Louvre.
Eugène Delacroix, the stereotypical Romanticist painter -rejected yet admired by the Paris Salon, his bold use of colour, highly dramatic scenes and great imagination defined the generations to come- is honoured in his largest retrospective in Spain and one of this year's most exciting shows.
Furious Medea (1838)
Oil on canvas,
Palais de Beaux Arts, Lille
This exhibition is organized chronologically according to Delacroix's ouvre: a classic dandy self-portrait starts the collection (left), followed by the artist's first academic years (look out for the tender model Aspasie) and a selection of portraits dominated by the dashing Louis Auguste Scwitter (on loan from London's National Gallery). The middle section encompasses Delacroix's mature Romantic works, those that brought him fame and are now the stars of the show: the monumental Greece on the ruins of Missolonghi exemplifies the liberal -albeit sentimental- views of Romanticism and an oil sketch of the famous The Death of Sardanapalus shows his brisk, innovative use of colour. Another highlight is The Women of Algiers, a large canvas coming all the way from the Louvre, executed during the artist's visit to Northern Africa. Other recurring, typically Romantic themes are also explored, including literature (Byron heroes and Hamlet, especially), religion and mythology -the tempestous Furious Medea is unmissable too, my favourite at the exhibition. The show ends with Delacroix's almost impressionistic landscapes and the swirls of colour and action of his Hunts series.     
Seated Arab (1832)
Chalk on paper
British Museum

The best...  It's free! Over 100 works from all over the world -some exclusively lent by France and the USA- are gathered at the biggest Delacroix retrospective since 1963, offering a rare oppurtunity to see his whole artistic career. Do not miss his oil studies, the lively crayon sketches from his North African travels and the illustrations for Goethe's Faust -because great artists also doodle. Probably the best exhibition in Madrid right now and a total must-see.

The worst...  It's free, so the small, narrow rooms are easily and very quickly crowded, but being quite a large place, it's not too difficult to get away from the throngs of visitors.

Tuesday, 6 December 2011

Masterpiece of the Month

The Adoration of the Kings (1564)
Pieter bruegel The Elder (c.1535 - 1569). Oil on oak, 111 x 83 cm. The National Gallery, London.

 An old manger, its beams bent with age, with a donkey inside eating hay, and the Virgin Mary at the centre with her characteristic blue mantle... But isn't there something wrong in this Nativity scene?  Why does baby Jesus recoil into his mother's lap?  And why are there soldiers at a time of peace and joy?

  Bruegel lived in a plague-ridden, war torn Europe, and many of his paintings reflect this dark time, denouncing its atrocities and injustice - the soldiers crowding on the left may represent the Spanish occupation of the Netherlands (the pointed halberds echo Velazquez's The Surrender of Breda), but may also act as a warning of Christ's Passion, brought about by greed. The same greed shown in the helmeted knight's curious eyes, or the surprise of the man with the spectacles; even Joseph (looking more like a drunk, tramp Santa Claus) has fallen to gossip and offers a distrustful, sideways glance to the Kings. Meanwhile, The Wise Men seem oblivious of it, offering their gifts the newborn Saviour, who tries to hide at the sight of what looks like myyrh, used for embalming bodies - once more, Bruegel references the Passion.

Or has Jesus sensed the greed, envy and jealousy He causes? Greed, by the way, that continues to fuel our Christmas spirit...

                                                               
 Bruegel's grotesque caricatures appear even in the holiest of moments, highlighting the lowest insincts of humanity.

Monday, 5 December 2011

Artist of the Month

Pieter Bruegel The Elder (Breughel, c.1525 - Brussels, 1569)
Flemish painter and printmaker
The Painter and the Buyer (c.1565)
Pen and ink on paper
 Peasants, sometimes mocked in merciless caricatures and others as foolish victims of sin, are the protagonists of Bruegel's works. He developed such an interest in them that it is said he disguised himself as one and attended weddings, so as to keep record and create more believable works, earning him the nickname "Peasant Bruegel" 

 We know little about Pieter's life: born around 1525, somewhere near the Flemish town of Breda (probably Breughel). He traveled to France and Italy and returned to Antwerp in 1551, becoming master in a painter's guild. Continuous travels between Italy and the (then) Netherlands influenced his themes, becoming more socially oriented. Finally settled in Brussels some ten years later, where he died. He began a lenghty dynasty of painters: his two children, Jan and Pieter, developed a more Baroque taste for landscapes, and Jan's son also became a painter (Jan the Younger); but they all lacked the critical eye of their forefather.

Netherlandish Proverbs (1559)
Oil on panel, 117 x 163cm,
Staatliche Museen, Berlin 

 Enormously influenced by Bosch - like all Dutch artists at the time- his early large-scale works are chaotic and full of detail (like Netherlandish Proverbs, right), demons and fantastical creatures abound but without the first-time originalty of Bosch. His later style (from Brussels) is more calm, focusing on peasants and faithfully depicting their way of life with a subtle humour that emphasizes human foolishness, making his themes strikingly recognizable in our own days...

Wednesday, 30 November 2011

Exhibitions

The Hermitage in the Prado
Prado Museum /8.11.2011 - 25.3.2012 / 12 € / Official Website
Lute Player (1595-96)
Caravaggio (Detail)
A wall-size photo of the Hermitage greets you as you enter this year's blockbuster exhibiton at The Prado. As part of the Dual Spain-Russia Year, after lending a handful of its masterpieces in early 2011, The Prado now receives some 170 works of the Hermitage's collection.
  Portraits of the tsars greet you in a short introduction on the creation of the museum. A black room follows, housing the most unique feature of the exhibit: exquisite gold from ancient Greece and the Scythian tribes of the Black Sea -the epic, sculptural detail of the Solokha Comb is not to be missed.  The next room is the highlight of the show, the Renaissance and Baroque masters, with too many treasures to describe: Titian's powerful Saint Sebastian, El Greco's poignant Saints Peter and Paul and Caravaggio's relaxed Lute player versus Rembrandt's Portrait of a Scholar, who looks rather surprised with his new location, in contrast to Velazque's merry Almuerzo. Continuing in chronological order, works by Rubens and Van Dyck set a courtly mood alongside lavish dresses; and the Enlightenment comes with Canova's eroticly penitent Mary Magdalen. Lastly, luxurious Imperial jewels glimmer next to Eastern weapons. 
   The spacious first floor starts by confronting Friedrich's Romantic landscapes with Monet's Impressionism. Following is the modern art collection ammased by the Muscovites Schukin and Morozov, which heavily features Picasso and Matisse, as well as Russian avant-garde like Kandinsky's large Composition VI  and Malevich's Black Square.

Solokha Comb (430-390 BC)


Conversation (1909-1912). Henri Matise


















The best... A unique opportunity to enjoy one of the finest selections of artworks that would be impossible to see together in the State Hermitage proper, creating a cultural timeline, from ancient crafts to suprematism. Also, interesting parallels are drawn throughout the exhibit (and probably without realising it): From the aformentioned ones to Picasso's rose period's Absinthe Drinker and his cubist Seated Woman to the wonderful complexity of the Chinese hairpins opposite the strikingly realistic Bouquet of cornflowers in a vase by Fabergé.
The worst... A chaotic organization that focuses too much on the history of the collection rather than its actual components, even various gemstone jars are dotted around the rooms to give us an idea of the Hermitage's inside apearance. And the flocks of hungry audio guiders crowding around a piece might just spoil your visit. 

Thursday, 3 November 2011

Masterpiece of the Month

Thought (1895).
Auguste Rodin (1840-1917). Marble.  Musée d' Orsay, Paris.

 November 17 is World Philosophy Day. A day to stop and think; think that we're now over 7 billion on Earth, think about the political changes in the Arab world, about our grim economic crisis... Just one moment of introspection, like the one created by Rodin some 116 years ago.

 A characteristic work of Rodin's mature years, Thought is a striking bust of his -presumed- lover Camille Claudel. Her head leans forward with a sombre look - a foreboding of her unrequited love? Leaving private matters aside, Rodin manages to create a vivid "solidification" (for lack of a better word) of what thoughts may look like. They are born from the jumbled, inconsistent mass of our mind -here represented by the raw, unworked marble block- for us to shape them, work with them, polish them into what we desire, be it a witty comment or a refined portrait of a young woman. Appropriately, it's original title was Thought emerging from Matter.
 And sculpture, of all the visual arts, is the one that best represents philosophy , simply because of the fact of being three-dimensional: the enigma philosophy seeks, i.e.: the bust of Camille; needs a multiple approach to be understood. If we look from the side, she's in profile, but we can also see her from the back, front and all sorts of different angles -just like we can choose to be biased or neutral, or have, continuing with this optical theme, various points of view on a subject. .

 Rodin must have been pretty sure of his enormous role in art, creating stuff  that would change culture for ever by changing society's views on it; that being the goal of many philosophers. Because Rodin, either knowingly or not, became the philospher of stone.



   

Artist of the Month

Auguste Rodin (Paris, 1840 - Meudon, 1917)
French Sculptor
Photograph of Rodin (1812)
Henri Manuel. Musée Rodin
 Rodin is, after Michelangelo, the best-known sculptor in the world -or, rather, his sculptures are the  famous ones. For he created icons such as The Kiss (1888-89) and The Thinker , works that have caused such a great impact they have seeped into our popular culture as archetypes of human behaviour.
Auguste Rodin<br>La Main de Dieu<br>© Musée Rodin - Photo : Christian Baraja
The Hand of God (1898-1902) Marble.
Musée Rodin, Paris   

 Born in Paris to a very poor, dysfunctional and sick family (that would later influence his subject matter greatly). His beginnings were difficult, rejected by art school and working only on small projects. Not until 1880, when he joined the Sèvres porcelain factory, did his works became widely appreciated, not without the controversy that was always with him. Three years later, his tempestous relationship with 18-year-old Camille Claudel started: being his apprentice, they served each other as models and inspiration; but as a result of unrequited love, Camille suffered from paranoia and depression. Probably to forget this dark period, Rodin married his long-life companion in 1917, to die in peace nine months later at the age of 77.

 Ground-breaking (at the time) and essential to art history is the best definition of Rodin's style. A great admirer of Renaisance art, his early sculptures (1870s) show a typically Classical staticity that evolved to a freer, more original style during the 80s and 90s: rough surfaces, unfinished fragments and complex compositions aimed to capture the monumentality of humanity. His favourite materials were marble and clay, where he could model his imagination with great ease, and bronze to produce casts that would spread his fame. He always worked from life, and his most beautiful and innovative pieces are studies of hands and feet, where the spontaneity of movement is best explored, like in The Hand Of God. As Rodin said: "...isolated hands still had the complete capacity to express emotions..."

Friday, 7 October 2011

Masterpiece of the month

Deeds of the Antichrist (c.1501)
Luca Signorelli (c.1450 - 1523). Fresco. Orvieto Cathedral, Italy.


Everything has two sides. Take a magnet, for example: positive- negative. Humans can be good and bad. Bussiness have two side as well. One is shown to the public -"the face"- and the other is the mastermind -"the brain"-, hiding behind its creation. The face is seen by everybody, but it can't do anything; it is the puppet of its maker, designed to be a perfect model- appealing, familiar and, essentially, believable- carrying out its master's bidding blindly, without being aware of the consequences of its acts.

And isn't that the profession of the Antichrist?
The Antichrist (detail)
Corbis Images
This can clearly be seen here: the devil adopts the image of Christ, proclaiming his sovereignty on Earth, as Satan whispers his orders. And this can only work if the two are close together; in fact, they are so close that they share an arm. This unusual representation of mankind's destructor is what makes this work so incredibly fascinating. But not only that, because Signorelli's fresco is structured in a complex narrative with a wealth of details. In the foreground, ignorant followers offer riches to the Antichrist, while some are perplexed at the massacre carried out at their left. A large cathedral is being profaned in the background as monks pray for salvation, but the Antichrist ressurects a corpse to testify his divinty. Finally, he is killed by an angel as his worshipers die in agony with him.

The author of the fresco (with Fra Angelico behind him), clad in black, stands impassively, a silent witness testifying against evil and the passing of time, maybe implying that not all is lost...

Saturday, 1 October 2011

Artist of the month

Luca Signorelli  (Cortona c.1441 - 1523)
Italian painter
Luca Signorelli (left, with Fra Angelico).
Detail from The Deeds of the Antichrist (c.1501),
Fresco ,Orvieto cathedral.
  Thousands of painters and sculptors that appeared in the Italian Renaissance were eclipsed by the overwhelming fame of Leonardo and Michelangelo. One of those who was lucky enough to remain (slightly) unforgotten was Luca Signorelli. Why? Because of his enormous influence on later generations.

  Born in Cortona as Luca d'Egidio de Ventura at an uncertain date (probably between 1441 and 1445). His apprenticeship took place around Tuscany and Umbria. In the latter, he became a pupil to Perugino, who was also Raphael's (1483 - 1520) mentor. Piero della Francesca's (1415 -1492) influence is also notable, but it has been very overrrated: the latter was obsessed with symmetrical symplicity, while Signorelli's work, albeit strongly structured too, was more concerned with human motion and space.  He died in his hometown, and barely stopped painting until he became paralysed by his old age.

  His early style, as said before, had complex, geometrical compositions, but the more he studied the human figure, the looser his style became. These detailed drawings- mainly of the male nude -are the next best thing before those of Michelangelo, who was greatly influenced by the San Brizio chapel frescoes of Orvieto Cathedral when painting The Last Judgement (a theme they have in common); just like Raphael as he executed his frescoes in the Vatican. Luca Signorelli represents the bridge between the classical restraint of the High renaissance, embodied by Botticeli and Piero della Francesca, and the explosion of colour and movement that is Mannerism, heralded by Michelangelo.

Friday, 16 September 2011

In memoriam

Richard Hamilton
(24 February 1922 - 13 September 2011)
Self portrait with yellow (1998)
Dye construction print, 39 x 39 cm,
Alan Cristea Gallery, London

  In 1956, Hamilton created a work that would change art and design, and our perception of them. This iconic piece was a collage named Just what is it that makes today's homes so different, so appealing?: Pop art was born.

  Born in London, he studied in the Royal Academy of Arts (where he was expelled) and the Slade School of Fine Art. In 1956 an exhibiton called This Is Tomorrow showcased his work and that of other British artists of the Independent Group, launching the phenomenon of Pop art, a.k.a. popular culture shown in galleries. Richard's work was acclaimed and made even more popular thanks to his design for The Beatles' White Album of 1968.
Just what is it... (1956)
Collage on paper, 26 x 25 cm,
Kunsthalle Tübingen
  His works mostly use magazine cuttings (later digital imagery) which, in a way, turned familiar objects into unique creations and imbued them with humour and irony (his most famous work, right, is the best example). This is was Pop art's aim, and it began ten years before Warhol's soup cans. His subjects were America's culture of consumerism and, later in his life, political and social issues, like Tony Blair's cowboy portrait from  2007.
 
 Richard Hamilton didn't enjoy the fame of Warhol or Roy Lichtenstien - probably for the best -, but without him they may not have existed, for he was the "father of Pop art": the re-inventor and humourist behind our lazy culture of mindless consumerism.

Sunday, 11 September 2011

9/11: Ten years

9/11: The day civilization stood still
 Ten years after the terrorirst attacks on the World Trade Centre in 2001, those terrible images are still in our heads: it is part of our modern history, an event that re-shaped the world and inaugurated the third millenium.


WTC Architects: Old and New
  Japanese-American architect Minoru Yamasaki (1912-1986) was the creator of the original WTC: the slender twin towers that rose above Manhattan. He was selected in 1962 and construction began in 1965 until 1973. The two towers look very much like any other skyscraper, but the simplicity of its design and its elegant forms made it instantly recognisable. They added to New York's character and quickly became a powerful icon. Let's say luckily, Yamasaki didn't live to see their destruction on 11th September 2001 (nor the 1993 bombings), so we'll never know what it feels like for an architect to lose one of his buildings (and such a famous one). It must be a heart wrenching moment, of great frustration and confusion -like to most of those who witnessed it- but also of loss, for something of your creation and effort has been erased for ever.
Petitions for a memorial on Ground Zero didn't take too long, but its creation has. The reconstruction of the WTC and its memorial was originally scheduled for completion in 2011, but it has been postponed for late 2013. The new Ground Zero will include five new skyscrapers:
     
    Computer generated image of the new WTC
    (skyscrapers described appear from left to right)
  • One WTC- the so called "Freedom Tower"- is the star of the show. The graceful, twisting, blue tower designed by Daniel Liebeskind will be the tallest building in New York and one of the tallest in the world, standing at the symbolic height of 1,776 m (the date of American Independence).
  • Two WTC is designed by Lord Norman Foster and has a characteristic sloping roof of four intersecting squares. According to Liebeskind's masterplan, it won't overshadow the memorial, representing a "wedge of light".
  • Three WTC by Richard Rogers, designed in his special metal-bracing-glass style, will include four pinnacles.
  • Four WTC will be the most similar to the originals, having a squre plan and facing the tip of Manhattan island. It is designed by Fumihiko Maki, also Japanese.
  • Five WTC is the only one without released plans, but its designer is the Kohn Pederson firm.
  • It will also include a transport hub designed by Santiago Calatrava and a museum. The finishing date is expected to be 2015. 
 Up to date, only the memorials are basically finished. They consist of two pools within the perimeter of the twin towers, inscribed with the names of the victims, and surrounded by oak trees. Designer Michael Arad, winner of the memorial competition, described them as "reflecting absence"- it's not a grand monument, but a discrete void of loss.
 This project has been, and still is, largely controversial, as citizens struggle to forget the dreadful events and face a bright, new skyline for Manhattan, and some have criticised it for "homogenizing" New York and making it lose its distinct flavour. But a city is always in constant change, with a flow of inhabitants, visitors  and ideas... and that has to be reflected in its appearance.


Influence on art
  A plane impacts the towers, and a cloud of dust and fire rises to the sky as the twin towers come crashing down. That sequence is unforgettable, a symbol of Western dominance and security destroyed in less than 24 hours. Obviously it didn't take too long for it to spark creativity: two films have been made (World Trade Center, by Oliver Stone, and the better United 93, by Paul Greengrass), both from 2006; thousand of conspiracy books and novels, comics and graphic novels, tv shows, documentaries (most famous being Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11)  even an opera, but few artworks.
 The reason for this is obvious: it's a recent, risky event that scares and offends alike. Probably the most controversial is Scott Blake's 9/11 Flipbook. It consists of photos of the plane crashing into the South Tower, accompanied by texts on the attacks. At first it seems banal and to some insulting, turning such a grave moment into a seemingly careless, entertaining object. But its more than that: it's a reflection on how mass media has blown up the attacks by showing them over and over again, how it infuses us with fear and insecurity in a much subtler "terrorist" manner. For more on this inrteresting subject, check out this video.  Another example is Cleveland artist Susan Crile, who created a series on the attacks (and also on the subsequent Irak war), executed with a simple realism, but having a surreal, phantasmagoric quality. Click on the image on the right or the link for  her interview on myartspace>blog.  But the most recent are Francesc Torres' photos of the 9/11 remnants stored in an empty hangar in JFK. Executed in only 5 weeks in 2009, the photos are now in a book (Memory remains, from National Geographic Society) and shown in simultaneous exhibitions in Barcelona's Centro de Cultura Contemporánea, Madrid's Palacio Cibeles (starting on the 16th sept.), New York's International Centre of Photography and London's Imperial War Museum; the latter three locations of islamist terrrorism attacks.
Steel beams from Ground Zero, by Francesc Torres.
(From Nat. Geographic.)
All shows feature the same images of objects barely recognisable or totally intact, but all housed in the abandoned hangar, its cold, metal walls giving them an eerie quality, like profane relics. In addition, each venue also has a particular surviving item: the one in Barcelona is a piece of a destroyed Alexander Calder, our next subject.


Lost artworks during 9/11
Apart from the iconic Twin Towers, many artworks were destroyed or badly damaged during the attacks. Most of them decorated the WTC buildings and others were outdoor installations. They include a Joan Miró tapestry, Roy Leichtenstein's Entablature Series (lithographs of architectural ornaments) and around 300 sculptures and drawings by Rodin belonging to the Cantor Fitzgerald collection, the largest Rodin private collector. For the complete list, click here.
 Among the outdoor sculptures, the biggest loss was Calder WTC Stabile, or Bent Propeller; a large, curvy, red mass. From this iconic installation only 30% survived and its rusty, disfigured shape serves as a reminder that humanity often destroys, either wanting or not, one of the few things that unites it: art.                                           
WTC Stabile (1971) by Calder, before and after 9/11 (Image from Washington Post) 

Friday, 2 September 2011

Masterpiece of the month

Pavonia (1858-59)
Lord Frederick Leighton (1830-1869). Oil on canvas. 53 x 41,5 cm. Private Collection.


  A beautiful woman turns to the viewer with an elegant twist of the neck as she holds a large, peacock fan; its feathers enveloping her almost like a halo... But she certainly isn't a saint, nor a courtesan - there are just not enough elements for us to deduce her identity. The chair she is sitting on is rather non-descript and the window ( or painting?) behind her doesn't offer much of a view. Probably the only thing we can be certain of is of her Mediterranean origin (glossy, raven hair; long nose; prominent cheekbones...); in fact, the model was Italian and she was a favourite of Leighton.
However, it is this lack of information that let's us concentrate on the sitter. We feel compelled to meet her gaze, but her brown, almond eyes are lost in thought. She raises an eyebrow, as if in question, and a twitch of a smile may appear at any moment - but it doesn't. Is she interrogating us with her raised eyebrows? Is she seducing us with that hint of a nape and serpentine movements? This ambiguity is what creates the best portraits (think Mona Lisa), and thus, a timeless beauty such as this.

This painting very clearly expresses the ideals of Aesthiticism (the Victorian cultural movement that stated "Art for art's sake" and included Oscar Wilde among its founders): this work intends to tell no story, it is just a portrait of a woman. A mysteriously beautiful, elgantly irresistible one, though.

Artist of the Month

Lord Frederick Leighton  (Scarborough, 1830 - London,  1896) 
British painter and scutptor
Self portrait (1880)
Oil on canvas, 30 x 25
Uffizzi

 The first British painter to be made a Lord -quite a great statement. Born into a bussiness family, he was educated at the University College School, London and started his artistic training. At the age of 24, he moved to Florence: a stay that would start his passion for the Renaissance. There he painted Cimabue's Celebrated Madonna is carried in Procession through the Streets of Florence (1853-5), which Queen Victoria bought, bringing him international fame. He also lived in Paris and in 1860 he relocated to London, where he was aquantied with the Pre-Raphaelites and the Aestheticists. He was an associate of the Royal Academy and in 1878 he was elected its president. In that same year he was knighted and by 1896, he was created Baron, but died a day later.
Flaming June (1895)
Oil on canvas, 120 x 120 cm,
Museo de Arte de Ponce
  Leighton's art is academicist at its most, with its smooth brushstrokes and historical or mythological subjects. He tried to achieve great monumentality and strengh in his work (probably due to his bonds with Queen Victoria and his lasting fame), which ended up in cold, frieze like compositions. His later works are much looser and humbler, and have a characteristic warmth. However, it is undeniable that he was a wonderful draughtsman and had a precise tecnique, specially in the neat folds of drapery (like in Flaming June, right). As a sculptor, he acomplished a new level of innovation: his mighty Athlete Wrestling with a Python (1877) was considered a renaissance in British sculture.
 A new Renaissance, that's what many artists of the time wanted, but Leighton created it by subtly mixing Classicist, Pre-Raphaelite and Michelangelesque elements, greatly influencing many generations.
 He, and Pavonia, featured in the recent V&A exhibition "Cult of Beauty: The Aesthetic Movement 1860-1900"

Tuesday, 30 August 2011

News

What makes this a true Leonardo?

 That's what experts at The National Gallery say about "Salvator Mundi": a painting forgotten for years has been declared to be nonetheless than a true Leonardo da Vinci.
 So why is a painting that was sold in 1956 for £45 as a work by a poor Leonardo imitator is now valued at £120m? For the art conossieurs and experts who authenticated the work, these are the reasons:
The" new" Da Vinci: Salvator Mundi (c.1500)
St.John the Baptist (1513-16)
Oil on walnut, 69 x 57cm,
Louvre, Paris.
 Mainly, the glass orb. Here, Christ is portrayed as "Saviour of the World" (Salvator Mundi in Latin), blessing and holding the world in one hand - the crystal globe.  A transparent object such as this would be difficult to represent, but Leonardo (having studied nature and light throughout his life), mastered the technical problems perfectly: the transparency, the light and the subtle image refraction. On the stylistic field, the Saviour's facial features have lots in common with other Da Vinci faces: perfect symmetry, long necks; thin, straight noses and small, thight-lipped mouths. His subjects have almond-shaped eyes and a dreamy gaze (look at the Mona Lisa, for instance), as well as softly curling hair (another of Da Vinci's obsessions were spirals), also seen in St John. But although his treatment of faces is unique, it was much copied later, spawning forgeries and copies.
 Technically, it also shares Leonardesque traits, chielfly the delicate sfummatto, present in the shades in the face and hair, is made by rubbing the oil paint with his fingers, creating subtle middle tones and merging the chin and neck. This effect can be found in several works. For example, observe the sfummatto in St.John the Baptist's  face and arm.
Wenceslas Hollar, after Da vinci

Drapery studies for a Salvator Mundi (c.1504-08)

 The painting was shown to Nicholas Penny, director of the National Gallery in London, and to Luke Syson, curator of its upcoming Leonardo exhibiton, by a consortium of American art dealers, who, after restoration, deemed it a true Leonardo, not only by its technique, but also by its history: it was first mentioned in the collection of Charles I in 1649, and subsequently passed through several owners until bought in 2005 by the aformentioned consortium. It also matches some drapery studies in the Royal Library, Windsor, and an engraving after Leonardo came out around 1650 (left); all adding up to the legitimacy of the author.
 But, frankly, the attribution seems rather hurried to me, especially taking into account the blockbuster exhibiton it will be shown at ( Leonardo da Vinci: Painter at the Court of Milan )and having a new  Da Vinci is about the highest claim a museum can have. However, let's not forget the incredible contribution its discovery has made to art history - and to history in general. 


         

    Saturday, 27 August 2011

    In memoriam

    Lucian Freud
    (8 December 1922 - 20 July 2011)


    Reflection (self portrait), 1985
    Oil on canvas, 56 x 51 cm,
    private collection

      Being the grandson of Sigmund Freud, Lucian could have gone down in history just as that. But luckily, he wasn't overshadowed by it and his unfinchingly realistic paintings are instantly recognizable.
     
     Born in Berlin, he moved to London in 1933 and became a British citizen in 1939. Here he became part of a group of painters (later called "The School of London"), which included Francis Bacon and Frank Auerbach.
     
     He was incredibly obsessed with human skin, its intimate folds, spots and imperfections. However, his earlier works - Girl with a kitten, 1947 - are cold, perhaps even weak, the surfaces looking crisp and clean. His style evolved gradually, becoming more expressionistic and lively, using thick impasto and warm, fleshy colurs. His models seem detached from the painter, as if the artist were examining them too closely, making them uncomfortable, distrustful.  The most famous of these is Benefits Supervisor Sleeping (1995), a remarkable study on human weakness and disease- which reached a record price in 2008. Other works include his portrait of Queen Elizabeth II from 2001 and of Kate Moss (2002), which show that also the rich and poweful are vulnerable to time. 
     
     A figure of penetrating analysis and disturbingly sincere art, Lucian Freud died at the age of 88, leaving the world without one of its closest inspectors, who described his work as such: "I paint people not because of what they are like, not exactly in spite of what they are like, but what they happen to be."  
     

    Thursday, 25 August 2011

    A small introduction...

       Welcome to "The Golden Cell", a blog dedicated to the enjoyment and study of art (painting, sculpture, video, performance...) and culture. I will regularly update the blog with different posts, including artwork of the month, news, lists, reviews and many others.
       Please feel free to comment, either to have your opinion, to ask something or start a debate, but always have in mind this blog is a personal view on art, and no offence is intended.

    The Art of Painting, Johannes Vermeer (c.1666)
    Oil on canvas, 130 x 110 cm
    Kunsthistoriches Museum, Vienna 
        Enjoy your stay at The Golden Cell,  
                                            TheArtLover